Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GH2 vs GH1

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GH2 vs GH1

    I've been looking at videos of both the Gh1 and Gh2 and don't see much of a difference. I'll be shooting a short video at the end of the month and am debating whether to buy a vest and arm for my Laing Stabalizer (stedicam knockoff) or a Gh1.

    I like the idea of shooting with two camera especially with one on the tripod while the other is on the stabalizer. But of course I like the great shots I'll be able to get with the vest and arm.

    What would you do?

  • #2
    Re: GH2 vs GH1

    The GH2 is a more refined camera and it's better for stills photography. It has more resolution (16MP v.s. 12MP) without sacrificing dynamic range or noise. All the specifications are better on the GH2, but the GH1 remains a good camera and it may well be that it's good enough for you. What do you currently use?

    Ian
    Founder/editor
    Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
    Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
    Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
    Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
    Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
    Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: GH2 vs GH1

      As a very broad rule having a second viewpoint will be a great addition to your filming. As long as you are steady enough on the stabiliser without vest to get the walkabout shots, having a second camera would be my choice. Apart form anything else, having the option of cutting between cameras lets you cover up a lot of things...
      All the best,
      Phil

      www.stickmanphotography.co.uk | www.customcreative.co.uk

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: GH2 vs GH1

        Originally posted by Ian View Post
        The GH2 is a more refined camera and it's better for stills photography. It has more resolution (16MP v.s. 12MP) without sacrificing dynamic range or noise. All the specifications are better on the GH2, but the GH1 remains a good camera and it may well be that it's good enough for you. What do you currently use?

        Ian
        Thanks.

        I have no interest in stills at all. I do need to be able to use the footage from the GH1 with the footage from the GH2, so my question is will I get the equavalent quality.

        I've heard there are hacks for the GH1 that will allow me the quality I need.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: GH2 vs GH1

          Originally posted by thestickman View Post
          As a very broad rule having a second viewpoint will be a great addition to your filming. As long as you are steady enough on the stabiliser without vest to get the walkabout shots, having a second camera would be my choice. Apart form anything else, having the option of cutting between cameras lets you cover up a lot of things...
          That was my thinking too, so my choice was a second GH2 that I thought I'd be able to get for $500. Not so.

          So now I'm looking at GH1s wondering if they can do the job.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: GH2 vs GH1

            It depends on what you need... They both shoot at the same resolutions - the GH1 is an older sensor so a bit more noisy, but unless you are shooting at high ISO you probably wouldn't notice the difference shot to shot IMO - so mixing the footage shouldn't be too much of a problem.

            One key difference is the modes they can record in.
            GH1: http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_G...697/index.html
            GH2: http://www.panasonic.co.uk/html/en_G...999/index.html
            As you can see the GH2 will give better quality because it allows a higher bitrate - up to 24Mbps. It also outputs proper 24fps rather than 24fps in 60i wrapper.
            The hacks around might even things up between a GH1 and an unhacked GH2, but a hacked GH2 would be better again of course.

            Another possibly key difference is the ability to do HDMI out/monitoring on the GH2 - it can be important in some setups.

            In fact there is a thread on just this over: here


            I haven't tried mixing these two personally, but according to Google it sounds like a lot of people do. I have mixed footage from a GoPro3, GH2 and Sony XDCAM - the trick is to ensure that you colour match well and then shoot different shots on each. E.g. shoot all your extreme wideangle action shots on the GoPro, steadicam walkabouts on the GH2 then static interviews on the Sony, that way as you cut between them it isn't jarring because they shots are so difference the the dirrerent image characteristics arn't too "in your face".

            At the end of the day good editing can help with differences between cameras - it can even be a feature - but you have to have the footage to start with. Only you can decide whether better steadicam shots or multiple angles are more important for your project I'm afraid!
            All the best,
            Phil

            www.stickmanphotography.co.uk | www.customcreative.co.uk

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: GH2 vs GH1

              Thanks, Stickman.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: GH2 vs GH1

                Originally posted by Ian View Post
                The GH2 is a more refined camera and it's better for stills photography. It has more resolution (16MP v.s. 12MP) without sacrificing dynamic range or noise. All the specifications are better on the GH2, but the GH1 remains a good camera and it may well be that it's good enough for you. What do you currently use?

                Ian
                Currently own a gh2 and needed a second camera to short a short feature.

                Comment

                Working...
                X