Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lens distortion and aberration

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lens distortion and aberration

    I might have posed this question some time back but here goes again, Will the in camera lens correction in the OM-D EM-10 Mk 1 rectify distortion and aberration when a Panasonic lens is fitted.

  • #2
    Re: Lens distortion and aberration

    I don't think so, but someone else may correct me on that.
    Ross
    I fiddle with violins (when I'm not fiddling with a camera).
    Cameras: OM-D E-M1 & Mk II, Olympus Stylus 1, OM-D E-M5.
    Lenses: M.ZD12-40mm f2.8 PRO Lens, M.ZD40-150mm f2.8 PRO Lens with MC-14, M.ZD12-50, M.ZD60 Macro, M.ZD75-300 Mk II, MMF-3, ZD14-54 II, Sigma 150mm F2.8 APO Macro DG HSM.
    Flashes: FL36R X2, FL50R, FL50.
    Software: Capture One Pro 10 (& Olympus Viewer 3).

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Lens distortion and aberration

      I always thought that it would be able to read the lens information and perform corrections, but I haven't read a definitive answer that I can recall. My only experience with a Panasonic lens on Olympus body is the Pan-Leica DG Summilux 25/1.4, which doesn't use software corrections.

      - Hal -
      A Still Mind - Photography, Music, Meditation, Ministry - www.astillmind.net
      Olympus E-M5; Panasonic-Leica DG Summilux 25mm; Zuiko 12-60 SWD, 50-200 SWD; Sigma 105 Macro; Rokinon (Samyang) 7.5mm fisheye; Olympus 8/1.8 PRO fisheye; FL-50R; Giottos MT-8361 tripod with Gitzo GH2780QR ballhead.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Lens distortion and aberration

        Thanks Hal & Ross, I have a couple of fellow photographers using Panasonic lenses on their Olympus cameras and I asked them the same question, but they did not have a technical answer, but both said they had not noticed any distortion or aberration problems so not to worry.

        I have another question for you guys, I might try using my old 14-42 4/3 ED lens via an adaptor on my EM-10, what focal length do I end up with and usable apertures and which adaptor, there are several on the market, any advice would be good even if its 'don't do it'

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Lens distortion and aberration

          Adaptors are on the market, but the cheap ones are cheap & may not be as reliable as the Olympus (or Panasonic) versions. If you could pick up the Oly MMF-2 cheap enough then that would be the best (or the Panasonic version) as it is cheaper than the weather sealed MMF-3 version. The focal lengths are the same since it is the same sensor (size) & the adaptor just makes up the distance from sensor that is taken up with a flappy mirror.
          Ross
          I fiddle with violins (when I'm not fiddling with a camera).
          Cameras: OM-D E-M1 & Mk II, Olympus Stylus 1, OM-D E-M5.
          Lenses: M.ZD12-40mm f2.8 PRO Lens, M.ZD40-150mm f2.8 PRO Lens with MC-14, M.ZD12-50, M.ZD60 Macro, M.ZD75-300 Mk II, MMF-3, ZD14-54 II, Sigma 150mm F2.8 APO Macro DG HSM.
          Flashes: FL36R X2, FL50R, FL50.
          Software: Capture One Pro 10 (& Olympus Viewer 3).

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Lens distortion and aberration

            I have used the MMF-3 adapter with an E-M5 and E-M1 mkII, both with the 12-60 SWD and 50-200 SWD lenses. The results varied a lot depending on the camera and the lens. The big issue was AF performance/speed. The E-M5 ranged from mediocre (12-60) to poor (50-200). The problem is that the older lenses were designed for phase-detection AF systems. The just don't respond well to the control signals put out by a contrast-detection system like that in the E-M5 and E-M10. The 12-60 did okay in bright light, but it tended to slow down a lot as the light levels dropped. The 50-200 often failed to focus even in daylight, and sometimes reported being in focus when it was not; focusing was also painfully slow.

            Results are much better with the E-M1 mkII, which includes on-chip phase-detection. AF with the 12-60 is very fast and accurate. The 50-200 is a little slower, but good enough for all but the fastest action. The new camera has addressed just about all of my complaints, and it's made using my old lenses a pleasure again.

            As Ross said, the genuine Olympus adapters are not cheap. If you had a great lens that you loved, I would say that it's worth getting the adapter to try it out. But for the 14-42, the adapter may not save you much over buying a comparable MFT lens, especially if you look for a used one. A dedicated MFT lens will almost certainly deliver much better AF performance on the E-M10 as well. Whether or not you find AF with your 14-42 acceptable will depend a lot on the lighting conditions and what you want/need from the lens.

            - Hal -
            A Still Mind - Photography, Music, Meditation, Ministry - www.astillmind.net
            Olympus E-M5; Panasonic-Leica DG Summilux 25mm; Zuiko 12-60 SWD, 50-200 SWD; Sigma 105 Macro; Rokinon (Samyang) 7.5mm fisheye; Olympus 8/1.8 PRO fisheye; FL-50R; Giottos MT-8361 tripod with Gitzo GH2780QR ballhead.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Lens distortion and aberration

              Thanks every one for useful advice, I think I will stick with M4/3 lenses on the EM-10,

              Comment

              Working...
              X