Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: UV Filters Heliopan vs ProMaster HGX or others???

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    UV Filters Heliopan vs ProMaster HGX or others???

    I'm here in the US and I just bought a Panny G1 and both lenses and I need 52mm UV filters. I am considering the Heliopan or the Promaster HGX which is about $15 less. I'm a newbie so I'm not real knowledgeable on the quality of these filters.

    Any info, ideas or suggestions would be appreciated.
    Red Panasonic G1 | Red ZS3 (ordered) | Mac Power Book | Photoshop Essentials 6
    SoCalRich's flickr

    There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.

    Ansel Adams

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Posts
    2,524
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    422
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    245
    Thanked in
    203 Posts
    Likes: 157
    Liked 103 Times in 74 Posts

    Re: UV Filters Heliopan vs ProMaster HGX or others???

    I recall some discussion of filters here a number of months ago, but I can't remember when or in which forum.

    The issue seems to be a matter of personal opinion to a large degree. I don't know of anyone who does scientific comparison tests of filters. I personally have a Hoya Pro-1 Digital on one of my lenses and a Heliopan SH-PMC on another (both UV filters). I can't tell any difference in picture quality between the two. I can't say for sure that these filters make a difference over cheaper ones, but my theory is that it doesn't make sense to spend money on a great lens and then put a cheap piece of glass in front of it.

    - Hal -
    A Still Mind - Photography, Music, Meditation, Ministry - www.astillmind.net
    Olympus E-M5; Panasonic-Leica DG Summilux 25mm; Zuiko 12-60 SWD, 50-200 SWD; Sigma 105 Macro; Rokinon (Samyang) 7.5mm fisheye; Olympus 8/1.8 PRO fisheye; FL-50R; Giottos MT-8361 tripod with Gitzo GH2780QR ballhead.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,338
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    4
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    106
    Thanked in
    81 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: UV Filters Heliopan vs ProMaster HGX or others???

    Quote Originally Posted by hschnee View Post
    I can't say for sure that these filters make a difference over cheaper ones, but my theory is that it doesn't make sense to spend money on a great lens and then put a cheap piece of glass in front of it.
    I totally agree! Although I don't see enough difference to warrant a jump to better brands like Heliopan over say a Hoya or Kenko Pro-1, but I wouldn't buy anything cheaper than that for the reason you stated.

    Of course, I only buy Polarizers and more expensive filters where price is a big factor. If I were willing to put a protective filter over my lens like a UV or Skylight, I would use the very best I can find since the price is not much anyways. If it's a difference of $15, I wouldn't think twice about it - I'd just get the better brand, or what I perceive to be the better of the two.

    In your case I would definitely get the Heliopan. I don't know much about Promaster but I know Heliopan is good, so that would be the basis of my decision.
    Olympus E-3 | Olympus E-PL2 PEN | Olympus E-PM1 PEN | Zuiko ED 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5 SWD | Zuiko 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 | Vivitar 100mm f/2.8 Macro | Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/2.8 | Konica Hexanon 50mm f/1.4 | Konica Hexanon 85mm f/1.8 | G.Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 | Zuiko 35mm f/3.5 Macro | Zuiko 25mm f/2.8 | KMZ Jupiter-3 50mm f/1.5 | E.Zuiko 200mm f/4 | Zuiko 75-150mm f/4 | Olympus EC-14 teleconverter | VF-2 and VF-3 Viewfinders | EMA-1 Mic Adapter | Olympus FL-36R and FL-50R speedlights

    cyclopsphoto.ca

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: UV Filters Heliopan vs ProMaster HGX or others???

    ok... thanks everyone for your comments... I appreciate it...
    Red Panasonic G1 | Red ZS3 (ordered) | Mac Power Book | Photoshop Essentials 6
    SoCalRich's flickr

    There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.

    Ansel Adams

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    21
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    15
    Thanked in
    11 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: UV Filters Heliopan vs ProMaster HGX or others???

    I said it before in another thread, but I'll say it again here: filters aren't a case where you get what you pay for. I have a bunch of cheap $15 Hoya UV filters for almost all of my lenses, but when I bought the 12-60mm I bought into the argument that it's a waste to buy an expensive lens and then put cheap glass in front of it (which hschnee mentioned as well).

    So for the 12-60mm I put on a Hoya HMC Super UV filter, which cost around $80. To be perfectly honest, I feel like a fool for having bought that over one of the cheap filters. I don't see any difference when compared to my cheaper filters. The Zuiko Digital 50mm macro, which has a cheap $15 Hoya UV filter, still out-resolves the 12-60mm. Some people claim to be able to see a difference, yet I've never had anyone tell me "that picture would have been better if you'd just removed that UV filter."

    I've seen someone do a side-by-side comparison with a filter on and off, and if that test of his is to be believed, then there is a bit of light loss with a filter. In theory a better filter should result in less light lost and better flaring protection. Can't say I've had issues with either of those even with the cheap filters, though...

    Finally, there's someone whose opinion I trust and respect. He had two circular polarizers; one was around $18 and the other was $80, if I remember right. He said that there was barely any difference between the two, and that the $18 one was actually slightly better.

    So there you have it. If you have money to burn and/or you'll feel better about your photography by having a very expensive filter in front of your lens, then you know what's right for you. If you're just buying a filter for some peace of mind about protecting the front element, then go with a reputable name (Hoya is my preferred) and get their cheapest one.

    Final note - I'm not saying that there's absolutely no difference between the more expensive filters and the cheaper ones, because I'm sure there is. I also don't think that anyone who buys an expensive filter is foolish - only me I just don't think that the difference justifies the price difference, especially for a hobbyist.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: UV Filters Heliopan vs ProMaster HGX or others???

    Thanks Ledgem... I appreciate your input...
    Red Panasonic G1 | Red ZS3 (ordered) | Mac Power Book | Photoshop Essentials 6
    SoCalRich's flickr

    There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.

    Ansel Adams

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •