Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    475
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    83
    Thanked in
    37 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts

    Arrow The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

    It's not widely hailed, but Four Thirds has a new, bigger, image sensor from Panasonic and it made its debut in the new Lumix DMC-GH1. We explore its benefits.

    More...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Posts
    2,522
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    419
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    244
    Thanked in
    202 Posts
    Likes: 157
    Liked 103 Times in 74 Posts

    Re: The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

    This is a neat idea, and so simple you wonder why no one (as far as I know) has done it before. Of course, the thing that really interests me is how the new sensor performs in terms of dynamic range and high-ISO noise. Hopefully tests (and new Olympus cameras!) will be coming soon.

    - Hal -
    A Still Mind - Photography, Music, Meditation, Ministry - www.astillmind.net
    Olympus E-M5; Panasonic-Leica DG Summilux 25mm; Zuiko 12-60 SWD, 50-200 SWD; Sigma 105 Macro; Rokinon (Samyang) 7.5mm fisheye; Olympus 8/1.8 PRO fisheye; FL-50R; Giottos MT-8361 tripod with Gitzo GH2780QR ballhead.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Hemel Hempstead UK
    Posts
    7,779
    Blog Entries
    13
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    163
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    796
    Thanked in
    495 Posts
    Likes: 98
    Liked 123 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

    Quote Originally Posted by hschnee View Post
    This is a neat idea, and so simple you wonder why no one (as far as I know) has done it before. Of course, the thing that really interests me is how the new sensor performs in terms of dynamic range and high-ISO noise. Hopefully tests (and new Olympus cameras!) will be coming soon.

    - Hal -
    Panasonic say that the GH1 sensor's low light sensitivity has been improved slightly over the G1 sensor (which is the same as in the E-30 and E-620). It's work in progress for Panasonic

    Ian
    Founder/editor
    Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
    Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
    Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
    Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
    Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
    Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5,099
    Blog Entries
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    398
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    443
    Thanked in
    354 Posts
    Likes: 70
    Liked 115 Times in 83 Posts

    Re: The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

    The slight increase in pixels for the wider formats is interesting but nothing to really get excited about. Of far more interest will be level of improvement in high ISO performance and DR with the latest generation sensor.
    View my ebook, The Light Fantastic, at: http://store.blurb.co.uk/ebooks/3026...ight-fantastic

    John

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    184
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

    Ian,

    It seems that at some time in the future we are likely to get an Oly camera with selectable aspect ratios. Perhaps you could suggest to Oly that one of those ratios should be 1:1.414 - that would allow direct printing onto A4 paper (and all the other A sizes as well) without having to mess about with additional cropping in PS.

    Thanks

    Roger

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Hemel Hempstead UK
    Posts
    7,779
    Blog Entries
    13
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    163
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    796
    Thanked in
    495 Posts
    Likes: 98
    Liked 123 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

    Quote Originally Posted by RogerMac View Post
    Ian,

    It seems that at some time in the future we are likely to get an Oly camera with selectable aspect ratios. Perhaps you could suggest to Oly that one of those ratios should be 1:1.414 - that would allow direct printing onto A4 paper (and all the other A sizes as well) without having to mess about with additional cropping in PS.

    Thanks

    Roger
    The E-30 and E-620 already offer a wide range of user-selctable frame aspect ratios: 4:3, 3:2, 16:9, 6:6 (square), 5:4, 7:6, 6:5, and 7:5. The lasty, 7:5 is an almost perfect match for A4.

    The main problem with all these options is that they are crops of the default 4:3 frame. The Panasonic GH1 sensor enables the maximum area to be covered by these frame ratios.

    Ian
    Founder/editor
    Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
    Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
    Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
    Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
    Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
    Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    184
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian View Post
    The E-30 and E-620 already offer a wide range of user-selctable frame aspect ratios: 4:3, 3:2, 16:9, 6:6 (square), 5:4, 7:6, 6:5, and 7:5. The lasty, 7:5 is an almost perfect match for A4.

    The main problem with all these options is that they are crops of the default 4:3 frame. The Panasonic GH1 sensor enables the maximum area to be covered by these frame ratios.

    Ian
    Thanks for the response.

    Yes 7:5 is a good match for A4, I had not realised that this was likely to be offered. As you imply these options are not likely to be really popular until the GH1 sensor is generally available.

    One final request: Could the whole sensor area be made available in RAW so that we can recover the maximum possible amount of data?


    Thanks again for the information


    Roger

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Hemel Hempstead UK
    Posts
    7,779
    Blog Entries
    13
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    163
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    796
    Thanked in
    495 Posts
    Likes: 98
    Liked 123 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

    Quote Originally Posted by RogerMac View Post
    Thanks for the response.

    Yes 7:5 is a good match for A4, I had not realised that this was likely to be offered. As you imply these options are not likely to be really popular until the GH1 sensor is generally available.

    One final request: Could the whole sensor area be made available in RAW so that we can recover the maximum possible amount of data?


    Thanks again for the information


    Roger
    On the E-30/E-620, the frame selections are only recorded in JPEG form. If you record RAW simultaneously with JPEG the RAW file is always the usual 'full' 4:3 area.

    On the GH1, I believe the JPEG and RAW files will be the same areas. If the whole sensor are was recorded, the extreme corners would be missing.

    Ian
    Founder/editor
    Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
    Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
    Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
    Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
    Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
    Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    184
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian View Post
    On the E-30/E-620, the frame selections are only recorded in JPEG form. If you record RAW simultaneously with JPEG the RAW file is always the usual 'full' 4:3 area.

    On the GH1, I believe the JPEG and RAW files will be the same areas. If the whole sensor are was recorded, the extreme corners would be missing.

    Ian

    I could live with that

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,373
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    665
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    171
    Thanked in
    123 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: The biggest Four Thirds sensor yet

    Of course, an amazing amount of printing goes on the non-metric paper areas, even if it's few countries. The current ratios sometimes work well, sometimes not. It's less the camera companies fault than the fault of the frame and paper makers. They need to change as they did once or twice before. Seriously , how many 8 x 10's are printed in the US (a lot) compared to "letter size" or 8.5 x 11 inches? Try to find 8 x 10 non-silver paper her. Epson makes it in packs of 10 or 20 sheets and they're special order. Try to buy a precut mat with an 8.5 x 11 opening as opposed to an 8 x10. I know of exactly one source and they're very pricey. Try to buy a ready made frame with a mat opening to suit an 8.5 x 11 print. One source I think...haven't tried them. That's simply insane from a marketing viewpoint. There's a ton of every quality of 8.5 x 11 inkjet printing paper sold from so-so to the Hahnenmule and Crane and other wonders. Why on earth would anyone think that all of those prints will remain unframed forever? Or get get custom mats and frames? Even crazier. And don't bring up that old "traditional" size of 11 x 14 inches. That was the size I often printed on when I was home printing, but finding 11 x 14 inkjet paper is , uh, challenging. A couple of years a ago I bought this monster Logan mat cutting thingie, simply because I like nice photos matted, and couldn't afford custom mats. Ugh.

    People not in the US may substitute metric sizes if you wish. The situation is equally inane no matter what size you use.

    Steve

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •