Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 78

Thread: Comparing the Digital Zuiko 50-200 old and new

  1. #51
    samxxz Guest

    Re: Comparing the Digital Zuiko 50-200 old and new

    Quote Originally Posted by fluffy View Post
    I don't know. Many of us would consider setting up an ID to respond to a specific message or person as very bad taste or dishonesty. I'm not accusing you of that certainly. I'm expressing a common online pov. A couple of questions, which can be answered or not, without prejudice. Are you the original seller of this thread (the one in the UK)? I doubt it, but hey? Have you recently lived in the Dallas, texas area? What do you know about translating Chinese restaurant menu items into English?

    Steve aka Fluffy
    You answered your own question that I am not the original seller. Yes I am from Dallas TX. I was selling a Zuiko 50-200 lens on eBay at the time and found this thread when researching the ongoing price. I never wanted to hide anything so I used the ID I commonly use on forums. You can also find this ID on eBay. But that's only my buyer ID. My seller ID has more than double the feedback points and of course it's 100% positive. I have no idea if this Bear is well respected on this forum or not. That didn't concern me.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,373
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    665
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    171
    Thanked in
    123 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Comparing the Digital Zuiko 50-200 old and new

    Yowza, you extensively research prices and not reputations or even previous content in threads? Just find a message you don't like although not addressed to you and jump in feet first. Hey, man, good luck and stay out bars.

    Steve

  3. #53
    samxxz Guest

    Re: Comparing the Digital Zuiko 50-200 old and new

    I did read through the WHOLE THREAD before posing, if that's what you accusing me of not doing. Are you expecting me to read the whole forum?

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Holy City
    Posts
    1,157
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    73
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    60
    Thanked in
    47 Posts
    Likes: 2
    Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts

    Re: Comparing the Digital Zuiko 50-200 old and new

    ~Reggie

    Nikon D3s | D800 | D7100 | Nikkor 14-24 f/2.8 | 70-200 f/2.8 VR II | Sigma 35 f/1.4 Art | 50 f/1.4 Art | Zeiss 100 f/2 Makro
    Panasonic DMC-L1 | PanaLeica 25 f/1.4
    Panasonic GF5 | GF3 | 20 f/1.7 II


    All images hosted courtesy of Flickr

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,373
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    665
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    171
    Thanked in
    123 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Comparing the Digital Zuiko 50-200 old and new

    Quote Originally Posted by ReggieB View Post
    It was a joke, more than anything, but to join to accuse an established and respected member of the forum a lying cheater, kind of trollish. Just sayin. But it was also a good excuse to post that picture.
    And a great image it is too. I've DL'd it.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,373
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    665
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    171
    Thanked in
    123 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Comparing the Digital Zuiko 50-200 old and new

    Quote Originally Posted by samxxz View Post
    I did read through the WHOLE THREAD before posing, if that's what you accusing me of not doing. Are you expecting me to read the whole forum?
    My apologies then. Your emails sound like you jumped in.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,373
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    665
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    171
    Thanked in
    123 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Samxxz

    I sent you a PM. Are you familiar enough with our software to find it. I only because because I find the positioning a bit odd and sometimes miss PMs for days, if not weeks.

    Steve

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,373
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    665
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    171
    Thanked in
    123 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Comparing the Digital Zuiko 50-200 old and new

    Quote Originally Posted by ReggieB View Post

    Darn right

    I was at the Disney Animal Kingdom site earlier (I want to go), and I found a seriously misspelled word.

    I wrote them a strong email about that -- I mean impressible kids read that site all the time and without proper spelling, none of this colour and honuor and Berkeley pronounced Barkly, this fine country will go down the tubes.

    I'm waiting up tonite for their reply.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Holy City
    Posts
    1,157
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    73
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    60
    Thanked in
    47 Posts
    Likes: 2
    Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts

    Re: Comparing the Digital Zuiko 50-200 old and new

    Quote Originally Posted by fluffy View Post
    Darn right

    I was at the Disney Animal Kingdom site earlier (I want to go), and I found a seriously misspelled word.

    I wrote them a strong email about that -- I mean impressible kids read that site all the time and without proper spelling, none of this colour and honuor and Berkeley pronounced Barkly, this fine country will go down the tubes.

    I'm waiting up tonite for their reply.

    I have been prepared to join a forum a couple of times because of some stupid statement, that sort of thing, but every time I have to sit back and remind myself how many people really are wrong on the internet, and how useless it is to fight with them. So there is no reason to get in to it. I think Kenton was in the right here, but to join a forum just to disagree with someone is kind of crazy. Thus, I try to avoid it.
    ~Reggie

    Nikon D3s | D800 | D7100 | Nikkor 14-24 f/2.8 | 70-200 f/2.8 VR II | Sigma 35 f/1.4 Art | 50 f/1.4 Art | Zeiss 100 f/2 Makro
    Panasonic DMC-L1 | PanaLeica 25 f/1.4
    Panasonic GF5 | GF3 | 20 f/1.7 II


    All images hosted courtesy of Flickr

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Malaga
    Posts
    3,755
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    52
    Thanked in
    39 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 6 Times in 1 Post

    Re: Comparing the Digital Zuiko 50-200 old and new

    I find it is easy enough to find people to disagree with without needing to go out of my way to join a forum just to do it - then again that's probably just me ! Love the cartoon by the way Reggie - thanks !

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •