Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Compare quality of 43 Zuiko lenses

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    23
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Compare quality of 43 Zuiko lenses

    After "migrating" from my old E-1 for Pentax DSLR and Micro 4-3 I realized that this old classic produces great images (mainly in daylight). I am about to get an E-1 with the Zuiko 14-54mm. lens - all in pristine condition.

    I want to slowly collect lenses for it.

    I would like to know if there is a difference in optical quality between the older version of the Zuiko 40-150 F-3.5-4.5 and the newer and lighter version 40-150 F-4-5.6?

    How does the Zuiko ED 70-300 lens compared?

    How good is the Sigma 50-200mm.?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Faro, Portugal
    Posts
    227
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    61
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    35
    Thanked in
    33 Posts
    Likes: 1
    Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts

    Re: Compare quality of 43 Zuiko lenses

    Hello.

    I can only speak for what I know... and I never had the old 40-150 f3.3-4.5.

    In practical terms, the later one is better: lighter, smaller, closest minimum focusing distance and the ability of being used in cameras with CDAF.

    In optical terms, I always heard the old one is better, but the few times I used it I didn't have both to compare.

    You can always read this:

    biofos old and new 40-150

    regards,

    Rogerio

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    233
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    15
    Thanked in
    14 Posts
    Likes: 118
    Liked 25 Times in 19 Posts

    Re: Compare quality of 43 Zuiko lenses

    The old one did focus faster than the 70-300 but is not usable with cameras without Paf. It showed little green fringing in high contrast areas in the frame. In combi with the EX25 you have a nice close focus lens with nice bookeh. This one is cropped very close to 1:1. Made with the E3.

    [IMG][/IMG]
    Last edited by dingenus; 16th May 2015 at 09:39 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Prague, Czech Rep.
    Posts
    544
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    46
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    59
    Thanked in
    45 Posts
    Likes: 13
    Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Re: Compare quality of 43 Zuiko lenses

    I would only say this - I have E-1s with 14-54, 40-150/3.5-4.5 and 70-300 and all these lenses are great. 40-150 Mk1 is superb on E-1, crispey sharp even wide open and silly cheap. Only "downsides" may be for someone the 1.5 meter minimal focusing distance and rotating front element.
    70-300 is more for macro/closeup photography, but I've been shooting even some sports and concerts with that, it is a very capable lens to get, if you dont want to lug and pay extra for 50-200 with TC14.
    Regards, Pavel.

    E-1(x2) | ZD 14-45 | ZD 14-54 | ZD 40-150 Mk.1 | ZD 70-300 | FL-50 | Velbon Sherpa 750R
    M42(Pancolar 50/1.8, Pentacon 200/4)+ M42->4/3 reduction

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    23
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Compare quality of 43 Zuiko lenses

    Thanks all for commenting!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •