Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,068
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    52
    Thanked in
    29 Posts
    Likes: 2
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

    Okay is there a difference between all these 4/3 to mFT adapters, pana or aftermarkets?

    The MMF-3 is weatherproof, not sure what it means in terms of build. But between MMF-1 and MMF-2 what is the difference?

    Also how about the aftermarket MMF adapter knockoffs? There is no
    optics in the adapter, just some rewiring, right?

    Anybody with actual experience with them?
    Bodies: E510, E30, E-PL1, Lenses: 12-60mm, 14-54mm, 50-200mm, 35mm, EC-14, 14-42mmL, 40-150mm, MMF-2.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,068
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    52
    Thanked in
    29 Posts
    Likes: 2
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Re: Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

    hmmm I can't delete this post, I found most my answers.

    So:

    MMF-1 is 2x heavier but metal construction
    MMF-2 is mostly plastic, some complain it's flimsy crap for too much money
    MMF-3 is like MMF-2 with an O-ring on the male adapter.

    Panny is like MMF-1.

    Chinese ones are like MMF-1 possibly, but I need to see accounts they are in fact good.
    If anyone has experience with the $25-$45 chinese adapters it'd be fantastic.
    Bodies: E510, E30, E-PL1, Lenses: 12-60mm, 14-54mm, 50-200mm, 35mm, EC-14, 14-42mmL, 40-150mm, MMF-2.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Faro, Portugal
    Posts
    227
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    61
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    35
    Thanked in
    33 Posts
    Likes: 1
    Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts

    Re: Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

    Hi.

    You are right in almost everything you wrote.

    From my experience I'll add this: The Chinese "Viltrox" adapter has something different in it's construction - can't say what - because every image taken with extreme wide angle will be some how blurred in the corners. From 14mm up you don't see it anymore.
    But until 12, 13mm the image is damaged.

    At first I thought it was a defective adapter (tilted or something like that) but then I looked around and found several other guys with the same problem.

    Regards,

    Rogerio

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    1,471
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    140
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    348
    Thanked in
    178 Posts
    Likes: 43
    Liked 176 Times in 54 Posts

    Re: Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

    mmf-3 is weather-proof (you've already got that mentioned..O-ring)...
    otherwise they all work fine with the Oly lenses.

    mmf-3 prefered when using heavier 4/3rd lenses..

    regards.
    E510, E3, E-PL1,E620 ,E-5,OM-D
    50-200SWD, 14-54Mk1, 50mm f2. 35mm,70-300mm,12-60mmSWD,PL-25mm-1.4,150mm-F2
    MFT: 14-42(kit)/12mm/45mm

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,068
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    52
    Thanked in
    29 Posts
    Likes: 2
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Re: Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

    I saw a lot of people rag on the MMF2 and MMF3 construction.

    I do want something that can take the abuse of holding a heavy
    lens like to 50-200 since it's one of the goals.
    Bodies: E510, E30, E-PL1, Lenses: 12-60mm, 14-54mm, 50-200mm, 35mm, EC-14, 14-42mmL, 40-150mm, MMF-2.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    1,471
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    140
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    348
    Thanked in
    178 Posts
    Likes: 43
    Liked 176 Times in 54 Posts

    Re: Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

    I have the mmf-1 always fixed to the 50-200swd..mostly used by my wife on the OMD , and the mmf-3 is permanently on the 150mm/f2.0....both these 4/3 lenses are very much in use outdoors in far from urban areas...they are rugged enough to survive my adventures.
    The mmf-1, I'd handle with a little bit more care ( it's my mental conditioning when I hold it) but with the 50-200...no second thoughts.
    Regards.
    E510, E3, E-PL1,E620 ,E-5,OM-D
    50-200SWD, 14-54Mk1, 50mm f2. 35mm,70-300mm,12-60mmSWD,PL-25mm-1.4,150mm-F2
    MFT: 14-42(kit)/12mm/45mm

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,068
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    52
    Thanked in
    29 Posts
    Likes: 2
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Re: Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

    Thanks Raj. My MMF1 got some damage kind of randomly hence I'm wary that the MMF2 and MMF3 might break if what people say about its flimsyness is true.

    The male ring got slightly bent from stress of the 50-200, IDK how it happened... But sometimes in the action, I do just leave the camera hanging on my shoulder.
    Bodies: E510, E30, E-PL1, Lenses: 12-60mm, 14-54mm, 50-200mm, 35mm, EC-14, 14-42mmL, 40-150mm, MMF-2.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Prague, Czech Rep.
    Posts
    544
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    46
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    59
    Thanked in
    45 Posts
    Likes: 13
    Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Re: Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

    I do not own any lens wider than 14mm, but so far the Viltrox JY-43F works well for me and it is built quite well. It may look plastic, but inside is strong metal core and unless you need sealing (which I would like to have, but MMF-3 is uber-expensive), this may be a way to go at a fraction of cost of the original.
    Regards, Pavel.

    E-1(x2) | ZD 14-45 | ZD 14-54 | ZD 40-150 Mk.1 | ZD 70-300 | FL-50 | Velbon Sherpa 750R
    M42(Pancolar 50/1.8, Pentacon 200/4)+ M42->4/3 reduction

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,068
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    52
    Thanked in
    29 Posts
    Likes: 2
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Re: Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

    Yes I saw chinese adapters sell for as low as $28 on ebay, vs $150 for an mmf-3... Hard to justify. I'm kinda currious what the mmf3 o-ring looks like. It might not be much...

    For extreme condition one can seal the adapter with gaffer tape I suppose. I know people that did that to their Canon camera and came out fine, even though it doesn't get much rougher than alkaline dust storms for electronics. Worst than salt...
    Bodies: E510, E30, E-PL1, Lenses: 12-60mm, 14-54mm, 50-200mm, 35mm, EC-14, 14-42mmL, 40-150mm, MMF-2.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    395
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    143
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    84
    Thanked in
    55 Posts
    Likes: 63
    Liked 2 Times in 1 Post

    Re: Mmf-1 mmf-2 mmf-3

    Quote Originally Posted by sonyhome View Post
    Okay is there a difference between all these 4/3 to mFT adapters, pana or aftermarkets?

    The MMF-3 is weatherproof, not sure what it means in terms of build. But between MMF-1 and MMF-2 what is the difference?

    Also how about the aftermarket MMF adapter knockoffs? There is no
    optics in the adapter, just some rewiring, right?

    Anybody with actual experience with them?
    I've got both an MMF-2 and an MMF-3 and I've never had any problems with them. But then I'm always careful about handling my cameras and lenses :-) This thread is the first where I've seen any comments about them being flimsy. I never had an MMF-1 for comparison, nor did have I seen anything from Olympus about why the MMF-2 replaced the MMF-1. As far as prices go, Olympus list prices are/were sky-high compared to the off brands. I don't have any of the off brands for comparison. I managed to get my Olys on various sales.

    Repeated identical posts with complaints without explanations don't impress me. Just my opinion, for what it is worth :-)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •