Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Rainforest Critique

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Posts
    2,535
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    430
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    252
    Thanked in
    206 Posts
    Likes: 157
    Liked 103 Times in 74 Posts

    Rainforest Critique

    My E-M5 had just a little bit of trouble on my trip to the Amazon. One night, there was a very heavy rain, and I discovered after-the-fact that the roof of my hut had several leaks, including one directly above the shelf on which my camera was sitting. All seemed well for a while, but during a walk in the forest the next day, there seemed to be some fog inside. The camera still worked fine, but some of my photos were affected.

    This is one of those; it ended up with low contrast, and, well, a foggy look. I did the best I could to salvage it. Have I succeeded? Do you like the composition? Is it a winner or an also-ran?



    - Hal -
    A Still Mind - Photography, Music, Meditation, Ministry - www.astillmind.net
    Olympus E-M5; Panasonic-Leica DG Summilux 25mm; Zuiko 12-60 SWD, 50-200 SWD; Sigma 105 Macro; Rokinon (Samyang) 7.5mm fisheye; Olympus 8/1.8 PRO fisheye; FL-50R; Giottos MT-8361 tripod with Gitzo GH2780QR ballhead.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ontario, Canada and Florida, USA
    Posts
    1,867
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    250
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    459
    Thanked in
    365 Posts
    Likes: 341
    Liked 268 Times in 160 Posts

    Re: Rainforest Critique

    In my view that is one of the best jungle images from your trip, good composition and exposure. Winner in my book.
    "Stef" E-620 and stuff...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    913
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    6
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    80
    Thanked in
    69 Posts
    Likes: 2
    Liked 30 Times in 23 Posts

    Re: Rainforest Critique

    Works for me also.
    It's the image that's important, not the tools used to make it.

    The Grumpy Snapper blog or follow me on Instagram.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Fulbeck
    Posts
    245
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    9
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    69
    Thanked in
    49 Posts
    Likes: 7
    Liked 45 Times in 28 Posts

    Re: Rainforest Critique

    It works OK but there is so much detail in a scene like this that can't be seen on a small screen. Would look brilliant on a big print though.

    Having spent a couple of years trekking and climbing in the rainforests of Papua New Guinea my most abiding memory is the pungent smell of all the aromatic vegetation and the noise of the insects, frogs and birds, something that can't as yet be reproduced on a computer screen. For that reason photographs of rainforest never really take me back to those years.

    David
    E-M1, Tamron 14-150mm, ED 75-300mm, ED 60mm, FL50R,
    Canon 7DII, Canon 400mm f5.6L, Sigma 150-600mm Sport, EF 55-250mm, EF 18-55mm, National Geographic Expedition Carbon.

    "It is better to light a single candle than curse the darkness" - Confucius (551479 BC)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Posts
    2,535
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    430
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    252
    Thanked in
    206 Posts
    Likes: 157
    Liked 103 Times in 74 Posts

    Re: Rainforest Critique

    Thank you for the feedback. This was one of my favorite compositions as well, so I was disappointed about the fogginess I ended up with. I'm thinking about having a 16x20" print made to enter this in a local photo contest. That should be big enough to bring out the detail. As for the feel of the moisture, smell of the clean air, sounds of the rustling leaves and birds . . . I'll have to work on that.

    - Hal -
    A Still Mind - Photography, Music, Meditation, Ministry - www.astillmind.net
    Olympus E-M5; Panasonic-Leica DG Summilux 25mm; Zuiko 12-60 SWD, 50-200 SWD; Sigma 105 Macro; Rokinon (Samyang) 7.5mm fisheye; Olympus 8/1.8 PRO fisheye; FL-50R; Giottos MT-8361 tripod with Gitzo GH2780QR ballhead.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5,099
    Blog Entries
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    398
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    443
    Thanked in
    354 Posts
    Likes: 70
    Liked 115 Times in 83 Posts

    Re: Rainforest Critique

    I think that it works very well in describing the type of vegitation encountered in the forest, particularly at ground level. It also provides a great sense of "being there" for the viewer and the slight diffusion, caused no doubt by the condensation on the sensor, adds to the atmosphere by suggesting an environment dominated by dampness.
    View my ebook, The Light Fantastic, at: http://store.blurb.co.uk/ebooks/3026...ight-fantastic

    John

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Kununurra
    Posts
    27
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Rainforest Critique

    I think it needs something as a focal point, it just seems busy all over the place. But certainly not a bad photo.
    "My opinion is greater than my ability"
    E5 | E620 | Zuiko 7-14 | Zuiko 14-54 | Zuiko 35-100 | Zuiko 70-300 |

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina
    Posts
    2,535
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    430
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    252
    Thanked in
    206 Posts
    Likes: 157
    Liked 103 Times in 74 Posts

    Re: Rainforest Critique

    I entered a 16x20" print of the photo above, and one other, in the photo contest. This one was accepted into the gallery show, but the other was not. I was confused because I thought that the other photo was a stronger image:

    Joshua Tree Sunset, taken at the Mojave National Preserve


    The Amazon photo didn't win any prizes. What really baffled me is which other photos were accepted into the show, and which won prizes. Many of the compositions were dull or just plain bad. Some had technical problems, like poor exposure or focusing. The judge seemed to prefer images with people in them; beyond that, I can't understand what he was seeing. Just goes to show how subjective the art of photography can be. And how wrong judges can be.

    - Hal -
    A Still Mind - Photography, Music, Meditation, Ministry - www.astillmind.net
    Olympus E-M5; Panasonic-Leica DG Summilux 25mm; Zuiko 12-60 SWD, 50-200 SWD; Sigma 105 Macro; Rokinon (Samyang) 7.5mm fisheye; Olympus 8/1.8 PRO fisheye; FL-50R; Giottos MT-8361 tripod with Gitzo GH2780QR ballhead.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,602
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    917
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    764
    Thanked in
    463 Posts
    Likes: 324
    Liked 564 Times in 259 Posts

    Re: Rainforest Critique

    Quote Originally Posted by hschnee View Post
    ..... This one was accepted into the gallery show, but the other was not. I was confused because I thought that the other photo was a stronger image:

    Joshua Tree Sunset, taken at the Mojave National Preserve



    - Hal -
    Hi Hal -

    I don't do critique and although I like the other one, this one works well with the various elements.

    Regards. Barr1e

Similar Threads

  1. Amazon Rainforest - Xixuau Reserve
    By hschnee in forum For the Album
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29th March 2014, 07:48 PM
  2. About the Critique subforum
    By Ruben in forum General discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 21st June 2011, 11:06 AM
  3. Birds of the Rainforest
    By stillie in forum For the Album
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 15th July 2009, 08:08 PM
  4. Portrait Critique
    By dodger in forum Critique
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28th January 2009, 10:48 PM
  5. Critique welcome
    By Monchee10 in forum Critique
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 27th November 2007, 03:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •