Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: Full resolution OM-D E-M5 samples compared to Pen E-P3, Lumix GH2 and Sony Alpha 55

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Hemel Hempstead UK
    Posts
    7,780
    Blog Entries
    13
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    164
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    796
    Thanked in
    495 Posts
    Likes: 98
    Liked 123 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: Full resolution OM-D E-M5 samples compared to Pen E-P3, Lumix GH2 and Sony Alpha 55

    Here are some more crops for comparison:



    E-M5 base ISO, normal exposure, developed from RAW in Viewer 2 and the completed in LR4.



    Sony Alpha A55 SLT recovered from -2EV under exposure from RAW in LR4.



    Sony Alpha A55 SLT normal exposure developed in LR4.

    The Sony Alpha 18-55 kit lens is pretty bad in the corners as you can see. It's very good in the centre of the frame though.

    Ian
    Founder/editor
    Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
    Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
    Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
    Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
    Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
    Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    133
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    4 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Full resolution OM-D E-M5 samples compared to Pen E-P3, Lumix GH2 and Sony Alpha 55

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian View Post
    Can I be sure what you mean - do the bricks in the RT developed crop you posted look normal or not? They look OK to me. But then they are not in a brightly lit situation which is where the problem seems to lie and they are not from an image that has been pushed by two stops.

    Ian


    The effect I refer to, I guess would be much clearer visible if we would have OM-D_5 versus PEN / E-5 samples with HG glass available.

    As I'm not aware of any such apropriate RAW samples, I'll try to explain as good as I can:

    Please have a look at the up-sampled crops below (taken from the RawTherapee crop I already did show)








    a) To me the upper image is way too soft / sleek / smoothed *especially* as the color shading within fairly similar areas is concerned (the bricks that is).
    Edge contrast on the other hand is ok, as far as I can tell (remember its plain "default" setting of RawTherapee).

    b) The lower image does show - in contrary – that minute details got IMO overly exaggerated (presumably to counter weight too highish NR that otherwise would soften the image too much)
    This is creating IMO an artificial touch overall, also with respect to those overly „highlighted“ details that appear to be non-related.

    c) Please remember what I've shown regarding noise comparison with my normalized black&white crops. (in the other thread http://www.fourthirds-user.com/forum...t=10757&page=3 )
    There it was evident, that overall noise of the OM-D_5 sensor was not particularly outstanding (just very slightly above GH2), the main noise „advantage“ of the new sensor lies in higher suppression of chroma noise.

    So adding a + b + c for me led to the conclusion, that the „improvement“ for the OM-D_5 in (chroma) noise is basically a software fake of that particular sensor – or lets say: a simple trade off to detail reconstruction.

    No free lunch here, IMO.

    Again, I suggest to not take my word for it regarding that IMO sensor specific „overly polished“ image appearance – there are already enough architecture images out there to get the glimpse (certainly the above crops – showing so few pixel - are not any well suited for this)


    The most interesting thing is – besides such IMO inferior images - there are also pretty and failrly well balanced pix available too, some at Robin Wong blog, some elsewhere or this one for example:

    http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equ...html#slideshow


    taken from here:
    http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equ...le-images.html

    The main difference may lie in pattern recognition routines that may act too aggressively and too unpredictable if the image provides the „right“ trigger

    as an aside:
    It may be worth to note that the linked portrait was IMO deliberately adjusted in colors to improve on the pale / bluish appearance of the rest of samples there (as "usually" delivered by this sensor).
    Last edited by mige0; 29th March 2012 at 03:27 PM.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Hemel Hempstead UK
    Posts
    7,780
    Blog Entries
    13
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    164
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    796
    Thanked in
    495 Posts
    Likes: 98
    Liked 123 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: Full resolution OM-D E-M5 samples compared to Pen E-P3, Lumix GH2 and Sony Alpha 55

    Although there are examples where noise reduction does happen in the imaging pipeline before the camera saves the RAW file (Sony admit to this although I understand you can switch it off where it is featured) Olympus has told me in the past that no processing of the data before it is saved as a RAW file happens with their cameras. From what you are saying, you feel that the RAW files are already manipulated?

    We don't know how Olympus has designed its Bayer filter for this sensor. There is a school of thought that the Panasonic sensors use two different greens in the filter and this would need to be factored in when doing the demosaicing in the RAW conversion process. Does the new sensor have the same bayer filter colour values as the earlier sensors?

    I'm not impressed by what Viewer 2 is doing to E-M5 RAW files. Even with the noise filter off there seems to be some smoothing going on. I was able to get very fine details from an E-M5 RAW using Raw Therapee - much better than Viewer 2, but then had problems getting the colour right. I think you saw these on the e-group site:



    Above is the original camera JPEG crop.



    Above is my RAW conversion using RAW Therapee initially and then finished off in Lightroom 4 from an uncompressed TIFF.

    So I feel something is not right with the processing of E-M5 raw files. This doubt will only be confirmed or otherwise when we start to see properly profiled and calibrated support for E-M5 RAW files.

    Ian
    Founder/editor
    Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
    Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
    Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
    Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
    Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
    Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    133
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    4 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Full resolution OM-D E-M5 samples compared to Pen E-P3, Lumix GH2 and Sony Alpha 55

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian View Post
    Although there are examples where noise reduction does happen in the imaging pipeline before the camera saves the RAW file (Sony admit to this although I understand you can switch it off where it is featured) Olympus has told me in the past that no processing of the data before it is saved as a RAW file happens with their cameras. From what you are saying, you feel that the RAW files are already manipulated?
    Please have a look here :

    http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/technol...e/cmos_01.html

    The conclusions I draw from that over simplified description is that actually there can be a looot going on, before a RAW file is written - which most naturally allows for a looot of "manipulation" regarding NR / image appearance.

    For me its not necessarily "manipulation" in a negative way (though for the OM-D_5 I definitely don't like the outcome) but I see it more as trade offs between design choices a sensor maker *has* to take his pick from.


    Quote Originally Posted by Ian View Post
    We don't know how Olympus has designed its Bayer filter for this sensor. There is a school of thought that the Panasonic sensors use two different greens in the filter and this would need to be factored in when doing the demosaicing in the RAW conversion process. Does the new sensor have the same Bayer filter color values as the earlier sensors?
    Not sure if a different Bayer filter could be blamed.
    Don't think the effects traced down so far would find a sufficient explanation this way

    Also, Olympus viewer should (!) already have been supporting that in case of.
    Clearly this is not happening.

    Also, according to Robin Wong who did develop all (!) the pix shown in a fresh Olympus Viewer he got for that matter from Olympus Malaysia the image appearance IMO is basically the same as yours or the ones developed with RawTherapee + extensive post-processing done by others.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Hemel Hempstead UK
    Posts
    7,780
    Blog Entries
    13
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    164
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    796
    Thanked in
    495 Posts
    Likes: 98
    Liked 123 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: Full resolution OM-D E-M5 samples compared to Pen E-P3, Lumix GH2 and Sony Alpha 55

    I have flagged our concerns with Toshi Terada at Olympus - I will let you know if he responds with any interesting comments.

    Ian
    Founder/editor
    Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
    Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
    Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
    Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
    Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
    Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    133
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    4 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Full resolution OM-D E-M5 samples compared to Pen E-P3, Lumix GH2 and Sony Alpha 55

    Ok, lets see ...

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    133
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    4 Posts
    Likes: 0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Full resolution OM-D E-M5 samples compared to Pen E-P3, Lumix GH2 and Sony Alpha 55

    Three weeks passed by - any reactions so far ?

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •