View Single Post
  #16  
Old 1st February 2010
AndyElliott's Avatar
AndyElliott AndyElliott is offline
Ubiquitous Gruntfuttock
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,846
Thanks: 31
Thanked 54 Times in 30 Posts
Re: DxOMark suggest Four Thirds sensor technology has made a big leap in performance

Quote:
Originally Posted by hschnee View Post
With all the buzz and excitement these days about back-lit sensors, if Panasonic were using one I have to believe that they would make a lot of noise (pun intended ) about it. That feature alone would be a big selling point and generate a lot of interest in Panasonic and anyone using their sensors.

- Hal -
How much benefit on an FT sensor might be a bit questionable. The circuitry that takes up space from the photosite in a traditional sensor is more or less of a fixed size, irrespective of the pixel size. So for a compact camera with a tiny sensor, the circuitry is a large proportion of the total pixel size - putting this behind, as in a 'back lit' design makes sense. For larger pixel sizes, the benefit is smaller. They also, currently, have issues to do with cooling as they make the sensor thicker, which doesn't help noise.

Andy
__________________
Olympus E-5, E-M5 ZD 12-60 f2.8-4, 50-200 f2.8-f3.5 SWD, 300 f2.8,
mZuiko 9-18, mZuiko 60 f2.8, mZuiko 45 f1.8, mZuiko 75 f1.8, mZuiko 75-300 I,
PL 25 f1.4 DG, PL 12-35 f2.8,
EC-14, HLD-4, HLD-6
Porst 50 f1.2, Konica Hexanon 50 f1.8, Vivitar Komine 135 f2.8 CF, 200 f3.5,
Metz 58, 48 AF-1, Manfrotto 441, Gimbal Head, Velbon Neopod 74, RF Cable Release

Gallery: http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/elliott.aje.andy Website: http://361photography.com
Reply With Quote